Truth in Science

Truth in Science
Before we get carried away ... PDF Print E-mail
Before we get carried away with all the hype, we refer readers to an article published Thursday 21st May in New Scientist entitled “Why Ida is not the Missing Link”. Chris Beard, Curator of Vertebrate Palaeontology at the Carnegie Museum of Natural History writes as follows:
What does Ida's anatomy tell us about her place on the family tree of humans and other primates? The fact that she retains primitive features that commonly occurred among all early primates, such as simple incisors rather than a full-fledged toothcomb, indicates that Ida belongs somewhere closer to the base of the tree than living lemurs do. But this does not necessarily make Ida a close relative of anthropoids – the group of primates that includes monkeys, apes – and humans. In order to establish that connection, Ida would have to have anthropoid-like features that evolved after anthropoids split away from lemurs and other early primates. Here, alas, Ida fails miserably.
 

Quote

Intelligent design theory could be discussed in schools, but only in the context of being one of a range of views on evolution that students might consider and evaluate against the evidence.

Lord Filkin 21.02.2005

Extras

Syndicate (updates)

All All News News