| An Echo from the Past |
|
|
|
|
The current edition of New Scientist (16th February) carries a small report entitled “Earliest Bats had no use for echos”. The article describes the work of Nancy Simmons of the American Museum of Natural History (New York) and her team who found the fossil of an ancient bat (Onychonycteris finneiyi) in the Green River Formation in Wyoming. Their work has been published in detail in the journal Nature [Nature 451: 818-821 (14 February 2008)]. In the words of the authors of this paper: Bats are unique among mammals as they possess the ability to fly and, in many cases, the ability to catch their prey using echolocation. Technically, bats are included in the order Chiroptera (meaning hand-wing) which is the second largest mammalian order with 966 species identified to date. There are two suborders, the Megachiroptera (megabats) and the Microchiroptera (microbats). All of the megabats belong to the same family (Pteropodidae) which includes the Old World fruit bats or flying foxes. The microbats are distributed across four superfamilies (17 families in total).
Richard Dawkins has devoted an entire chapter on echolocation in bats in “The Blind Watchmaker”. This is a useful overview of this remarkable phenomenon. In the second chapter, entitled “Good Design”, he writes: "Not all bats use echolocation. The Old World tropical fruit bats have good vision and only use their eyes for finding their way around." [The Blind Watchmaker (1991) London: Penguin p.24]
In fact, megabats have large eyes and exceptionally good colour eyesight, similar to the vision of an owl at night. All bats are mainly nocturnal, microbats rely on echolocation to catch their prey whereas most megabats rely on their eyesight and other senses. As Professor Dawkins rightly points out, there are a few exceptions. An example is the Egyptian Fruit bat (Rousettus aegyptiacus) which also uses low pitched sounds and echo location in addition to its eyesight.
Characteristic of echo-locating bats is the increased size of the inner ear (cochlea) together with the associated complex neuroanatomy of the brain stem. According to the Nature article, O. finneyi possessed a relatively small cochlea similar to that seen in modern non-echolocating bats (Pteropodidae). In addition, the New Scientist suggests: This of course is total nonsense as the article goes on to include the following quote from Nancy Simmons:
The feature that seems to mark out O. finneyi as different is the fact that it possessed teeth characteristic of an insectivore. Modern megabats, however, can and do eat insects as an extra source of protein [see SE Courts Dietary Strategies of Old World Fruit Bats: how do they obtain sufficient protein? Mammal Review (1998) 28:185].
And so the Green River formation continues to yield up its treasures. Within the same strata have been found fossil fish, insects, snails, turtles, crocodiles, birds, and plant remains. The new discovered species (Onychonycteris finneiyi) is now added to the list of mammals that also includes another ancient bat (Icaronycteris index). Without any justification, New Scientist concludes as follows: |
Intelligent design theory could be discussed in schools, but only in the context of being one of a range of views on evolution that students might consider and evaluate against the evidence. Lord Filkin 21.02.2005 |