Truth in Science

Truth in Science
What the blogs are saying PDF Print E-mail

An upcoming University of London debate: “Intelligent Design and Evolution have the same status as scientific theories” is commented on at ID in the UK. Professor Steve Fuller will speak for the motion and Professor Lewis Wolpert against.

Meanwhile, anti-ID activists report their successes and failures in lobbying Parliament both in Westminster (one, two, three, four, five) and Edinburgh (one).

David Anderson keeps up his ongoing exposé of the so-called British Centre for Science Education. He also seems to be turning attention to his alma mater’s Professor for the Public Understanding of Science. Like a true rationalist, he starts by asking the question Does Richard Dawkins exist?

Pagan Prattle finds it strange that the Sunday Times reported Truth in Science as welcoming the government decision to teach intelligent design in religious education classes. We though it was strange as well, as we've made it very clear that we would like to see intelligent design in science classes, not RE.

And finally, “I think Truth in Science is the best ID website/blogsite anywhere. The Brits always do that sort of thing best.” That’s the opinion of Canadian journalist Denyse O’Leary on Post-darwinist!

 

Quote

A fair result can be obtained only by fully stating and balancing the facts and arguments on both sides of each question.

Charles Darwin

Extras

Syndicate (updates)

All All News News