
Galapagos finches showing different beak shapes
On the Galapagos Islands in the Pacific
Ocean, close to the equator, there are a variety of different
finches, which vary in the shape and size of their beaks. It appears
that the finches colonised the Islands from mainland South
America, and then diverged in form. The distance between the islands
meant that the finches on different islands could not interbreed, so
the populations on the different island tended to become distinct.
Different populations also became specialised for different food
sources, birds with thin, sharp beaks eating insects and birds with
large, sturdy beaks eating nuts.
Darwin collected some of these
finches when he visited the Galapagos Islands, and it is often stated
that the finches were key to the development of his theory of
evolution. They are used as evidence for his theory in many textbooks.
Were the Finches important to Darwin in formulating his theory?
School
children are often taught that the finches of the Galapagos Islands
were very important in helping Darwin to come up with his theory of
evolution. For example, the
BBC GCSE Bitesize Revision Biology: Variation and inheritance states:
Whilst
studying wildlife on the Galapagos Islands [Darwin] noticed that the
Galapagos finches showed wide variations - eg in beak shape and size -
from island to island. Darwin deduced that these differences made the
finches better adapted to take advantage of the food in their
particular local environment - thin, sharp beaks prevailing where the
birds' main food was insects and grubs, and large claw-shaped beaks
where their diet was buds, fruit and nuts. In each locality the finch
population had somehow developed beaks which were suitable for that
particular environment.
Darwin concluded that in each locality
one or more individual finch happened to acquire, by random mutation, a
beak shape more suitable for the food sources in that locality. These
individuals then had a competitive advantage over their fellow finches,
enabling them to grow and reproduce more successfully, and pass on
their more specialised beaks to successive generations - until
eventually the characteristic had spread throughout the finch
population in that locality.
The BBC is mistaken in much
of what it says here. When he was on the Galapagos Islands, Darwin did
not notice that different islands had different finches. Neither did he
realise that the finches were closely related despite their differences
in beak shape. He did not match different beak shapes to different
diets. Even after his return to London, Darwin's biographers note that
he "remained confused by the Galapagos finches...unaware of the
importance of their different beaks...He had no sense of a single,
closely related group becoming specialized and adapted to different
environmental niches." (p. 209,
Darwin - A. Desmond and J. Moore).
Darwin did not mention the finches in his book
The Origin of Species. They only appear in his
Journal,
being mentioned only in passing in the first edition (1839), and then
having a few paragraphs and a picture six years later in the revised
edition (1845). The most that Darwin would ever say about finch
evolution is found here:
Seeing this gradation and
diversity of structure in one small, intimately related group of birds,
one might really fancy that from an original paucity of birds in this
archipelago, one species had been taken and modified for different
ends... Unfortunately most of the specimens of the finch tribe were
mingled together; but I have strong reasons to suspect that some of the
species of the sub-group Geospiza are confined to separate islands. If
the different islands have their representatives of Geospiza, it may
help to explain the singularly large number of the species of this
sub-group in this one small archipelago, and as a probable consequence
of their numbers, the perfectly graduated series in the size of their
beaks. (pp403-420)
Darwin, Journal of Researches into
the Natural History and Geology of the countries visited during the
voyage round the world of H.M.S. Beagle, revised edition, Henry Colburn 1845.
So
all Darwin did was speculate that the different finches had descended
from a common ancestor and had changed to be able to do different
things. He was never sure that the different species were from
different islands. He certainly never came up with the detailed theory
for how the finches diversified which the BBC suggests.
The BBC
makes this mistake because a myth has arisen around these Galapagos
Finches. They were never known as "Darwin's Finches" until 1936, and
the name was popularised by ornithologist David Lack in his book
Darwin's Finches (1947).
Lack described the detailed account of Finch evolution, recounted by
the BBC, and also promoted the myth that the finches had given Darwin
important insights into evolution.
"Darwin's Finches"
are found repeatedly in school biology textbooks, and the WJEC A-Level
Biology syllabus and the Intermediate 2 Biology syllabus mandate their
teaching.
What do the Finches demonstrate about evolution?
Though
the finches were not important in the work of Charles Darwin, they do
tell us something about evolution. In particular, over the past few
decades, two scientists have done an excellent long term study on the
finches on one of the Galapagos Islands. This is accurately described
by the textbook
Advanced Biology. (Jones, M., and G. Jones.
1997. Cambridge University Press) The authors recount how from 1977 to
1982 there was a drought on one of the Galapagos Islands, and due to
natural selection the average finch beak size became larger…
However, this proved not to be the end of the story. If it continued in this way, the average beak size of G. fortis would continue to get larger and larger. But this has not happened (p. 153)
This
cumulative change does not occur for two reasons. (1) There are
disadvantages to having a large beak, especially when a bird is young.
This can outweigh the advantages. (2) The selection pressure on the
island fluctuates. In 1982 the drought stopped and there was selection
for birds with small beaks.
It can therefore be argued that the
study shows natural limits to evolutionary change. Variation in a
species is a good thing, as it gives them the ability to cope with
environmental change, but variation does have limits.
Many
textbooks do not go into such detail, and simply describe the finches
as a good example of a range of species evolving from a common
ancestor.
The Galapagos finches afford an excellent
example of adaptive radiation. It is assumed by evolutionists that a
stock of ancestral finches reached the islands from the mainland and
then, in the absence of much competition, evolved to fill many of the
empty ecological niches occupied on the mainland by species absent from
the islands.” (p. 725) Advanced Biology. Roberts, M., M. Reiss, and G. Monger. 2000. Nelson
Conclusion
The
Galapagos finches were not as important to Darwin as is often claimed,
but they are a good example of micro-evolution. They show us that
finches can vary in their morphology, and that natural selection has a
role in this.
This study does not give evidence for
macro-evolution, and does not prove that natural selection and random
mutation could produce the living world as we know it from simple
single-celled ancestors.